Current time: 06-09-2010, 06:32 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
KINK = NO CONWAY?
28-07-2010, 11:37 AM
Post: #1
KINK = NO CONWAY?
Does the signing of KInk end the chase for Conway or is that deal this in the pipeline? Getting very confused with all the comings and goings these days
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 12:21 PM
Post: #2
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
Conway is still on the list and im expecting him to be signed very soon along with Dawson.

Keep the faith.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 12:26 PM
Post: #3
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
Will this depend on outgoings VB? I am not sure about Dawson being worth the money.Unless you see Wheater leaving.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 01:26 PM
Post: #4
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
You have to be right Linth there must be a time very soon where players will be leaving ok Mido was probably a free or as they say a nominal fee (VB do you know) and with still in coming activity (however believe that the last two will be finally business over and done with) there must be some balancing of the books.

We thought Lita might be on the move is that still possible?
Emnes we all want to see him go but who the hell would pay money for him and tbh a loan out is no good to us now!!!
What sellable assests do we have left GON???? or you may well be correct Wheater!!

Someone needs to go for a decent fee unless some of this is being personally financed by Gibson
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 01:46 PM
Post: #5
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
Mido will be getting a free transfer but its getting his big salary off the books which will allow us to complete the signings of both Conway and Dawson. If we then say goodbye to Emnes,Digard and may be O'Neil there will be more money made available to Strachan but only if these 2 or 3 are actually sold and not loaned out.

Gibson has given Strachan quite a healthy transfer budget as we have already seen.We are by far the biggest spenders in the Championship and we still havent concluded our business.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 01:50 PM
Post: #6
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
TBH DS I think you will have to send Emnes out on appro coz I can't see anybody buying him,especially if he's not playing.At least you would be freeing up money in wages.The same goes for Diggard.Unless he's playing its wasting valuable finance.Another golden Goulon.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2010, 06:13 PM
Post: #7
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
Does anyone know how good this Dawson is?

[Image: borowipcopy.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
29-07-2010, 07:23 PM
Post: #8
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
CC hasn't featured in the last 2 friendly games for Dundee Utd, does anyone know whether it's his shin injury that is keeping him out, or are the club expecting to let him go?

Boro 'til I die
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
29-07-2010, 07:27 PM
Post: #9
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
TP ... they could claim its an injury but we know that means nothing.Lets hope we can resolve the issue with Mido going to Ajax so that the Conway deal can get finalised and have him ready to start training at Rockcliffe on Monday.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
29-07-2010, 07:33 PM
Post: #10
RE: KINK = NO CONWAY?
Definitely! With the season starting a week on Saturdy, it would be nice to get all our chess pieces in place

Boro 'til I die
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: